I have been asked by a young artist for my take on the subject of
critiques and criticism of art so decided to write a few lines from my
honest personal opinion.
A critique is usually welcomed, if asked for, by someone the artist
trusts. Why would you want a critique in the first place? Well,
some of the many reasons could include the fact you the artist would
like to improve in picture making, or something isn't quite right and
you don't know what it is and need an objective viewpoint. These
are the two reasons I primarily request a critique. Should I ask
my non artist mom or brother, or spouse? Not usually as from them
I would probably get a biased opinion that whatever I do is nice.
I don't want 'nice' when I'm trying to problem solve - I want 'nice'
when I am truly proud of what I have created and not before. Even
then, 'nice' is a term most artists cringe over. We want 'spectacular'
or 'absolutely beautiful', but 'nice' usually means it's
mediocre. We are trying to create an effect that impinges!
Also I do not like anyone to see what I am working on until it is
finished because any comment about it, good or bad, can sway my
decision making if ever so slightly. If a well-meaning person walks
into the studio and says something as simple as "I like that blue
colour in the background", when I was going to gray it down with orange
or whatever, my thoughts will then be muddled a bit when the brush is
loaded with another colour - 'If they like the blue, am I making the
right decision to change it" etc. etc etc....... Then it becomes their
painting and not mine - to me a time waster in the straightforward
thought process of painting.
That being said, on many occasions I have asked well-meaning non artist
people if there is anything in a painting which bugs them or sticks
their attention, or where their eyes go within the piece I am working
on, always asking specific questions and not a general one such as
"what do you think?". This sometimes gives me a guide if I am too
close to it to see any out-points. This works best if asked for instead
of being originated. Like this scenario - you are in that coveted
zone working on a painting and happy with it's progress. Someone,
for any reason, pops into the studio for a second and says - 'that
person's eyes look weird'. "Really?" (You like the eyes the
way they are and resent comments otherwise). War, words, how dare you
etc. The comment about the eyes may have been correct, but what will be
resented is not seeing it and asking about it yourself. At least this
is how it works for me - I am an Aquarian and a bit sensitive anyway,
if that has anything to do with it.
So who is best to ask for a proper critique? Another art professional
is best - at least then you would be speaking the same language such as
- "reduce the values in the secondary point of interest" or " the
vertical perspective does not correspond with the vanishing point" or "
too many straight lines" etc. This I understand and can fix as it is
more specific than 'something doesn't seem right.'
Now criticism is a whole other kettle of poisson. Criticism is
just that - criticism. Yes, constructive criticism is quite valuable if
it gives some direction in how it could be done better, as in a
critique, but if it just tears the art to pieces, that is the down side
of the subject. There are so many varying opinions and tastes regarding
art. Personally, I have had some doozie criticisms in my forty-year
career, mostly in the early days when I was impressionable and not as
secure in my craft as I am now, and a few times I was flattened and
thought I would never paint again. That unfortunately is one of
the side effects of scathing criticisms - they tend to stop an artist
from creating. The tough ones plow through it and develop a bit
of a thick skin, but some just give up. That is a crime in my books.
Not everyone will like what you do. Out of 6 billion people the odds
are pretty even for every taste in art. If I like abstract
expressionism, should I criticize someone who works in photo
realism? No, I have no right, and neither does anyone have the
right to criticize any artist based on taste or opinion - unless their
motive is to stop them from creating.
Ask for and accept critiques if you choose, but ignore criticism which invalidate at all costs.
ADDENDUM: We often talk about being on the receiving end of critiques,
but not much about the responsibility of the person giving them.
Whenever I am asked to critique an artists work, the first thing I do
is ask them what they were trying to communicate, what did they want
their center of interest to be etc...that way I am better able to
ascertain if they achieved what they wanted and be better able to
suggest ways to do it better. This way, the communication remains
theirs and not mine. I will help with the technical means to get their
communication across better if I can. It is their creation after
all.
.

6 Responses to Critiques and Criticisms
via diannhaist.com
Like you said when a painting is seen not finished I usually mention that fact, and then ask for specific comments about what I am concerned about in the painting.
Our Plein Air group every first friday has a critque session, good artists and great critques, sometimes very humbling.
All I really have to do to get a idea how my painting is coming I show it to my wife, she can't hide her feelings off her face no matter how hard she tries.
via diannhaist.com
via diannhaist.com
via diannhaist.com
via diannhaist.com
Naturally, I visited your paintings, and enjoyed them for their moods and beauty. So, thanks for some time well spent, yours and mine.
via diannhaist.com
I do only post when I have something I feel needs to be communicated. In our age of information overload, I do not feel that anyone else in the world would be interested in when the laundry is being done.
Just took a look at your website and your landscapes are beautiful. Good work.
Again, thanks.
Diann